Creative Practice vs. Audience Building: Why One Actually Works

Why patience becomes a competitive advantage when everyone else is optimizing for speed

Through July, I shared

• why most Substack advice backfires

• how to master the tech stack (newsletters and subscriber relationships),

• and how to use the discovery platform (Notes) to reach potential readers through authentic engagement.

Today, I want to share the pattern I've noticed in creators who seem to have cracked the sustainability code. It's not about growth hacks or optimization tricks. It's about creating a feedback loop between both systems that makes your creative work stronger and more sustainable than anything you can build on traditional social media.

The approach is slower than what most creators expect, but it builds something that can last for years instead of burning out in months.

The Strategy Nobody Talks About

Here's what I've learned after watching succeed and fail on Substack: the platform doesn't reward what you think it rewards.

Everyone focuses on the obvious metrics—subscriber count, open rates, likes on Notes. But the creators who build something lasting are optimizing for something completely different.

Creative momentum is the compound effect of consistently exploring ideas that genuinely interest you, with an audience that's genuinely interested in following that exploration.

Most creators are trying to use Substack to build an audience.

The creators who last are using Substack to build a creative practice that happens to attract an audience.

The Two-System Feedback Loop

The real strategy isn't about mastering each system perfectly. It's about creating a feedback loop between them that makes your creative work stronger.

Here's how it works: You use Notes to discover what you're curious about, then you use your newsletter to explore those curiosities deeply. The depth of your newsletter exploration generates new questions, which become new Notes, which reveal new curiosities.

Most creators try to use Notes to promote their newsletter. But the most successful ones I know use Notes to understand their own creative interests. They pay attention to which of their thoughts generate the most engagement—not to chase engagement, but to understand which ideas have the most energy for them to explore.

When you post a Note about creative resistance and get twenty thoughtful comments, you're not just getting "engagement." You're getting market research about your own curiosity. You're learning that this idea has enough energy to sustain a deeper exploration.

The newsletter becomes the place where you develop those ideas fully. The Notes become the place where you test new directions and discover what's worth developing.

This creates a cycle: curiosity → testing → development → new curiosity.

The Reverse Strategy

Instead of starting with "what should I write about?" start with "what am I genuinely curious about right now?"

Share that curiosity as a Note. Not a polished thought—a genuine question or observation. See what happens. Pay attention not just to how many people engage, but to how the engagement makes you feel.

• Are you energized by the responses?

• Do they make you want to explore the idea further? Or do they feel like obligation?

This is the difference between content creation and creative practice. Content creation asks "what will get engagement?" Creative practice asks "what will help me understand something I care about?"

The creators I see last AND grow on Substack are the ones who figure out how to turn their genuine curiosities into a sustainable creative practice.

When you follow your actual interests instead of trying to guess what your audience wants, something interesting happens: you attract people who are interested in the same questions you're exploring. Your audience becomes a community of people who care about similar things, rather than just people who consume your content.

The Patience Advantage

Here's the insight that might change something for you: in a world where everyone is trying to hack rapid growth, patience becomes a competitive advantage.

While other creators are burning out trying to post daily, optimize everything, and chase viral moments, you can build something more durable by moving at the pace of actual insight development.

Most breakthrough insights don't happen on a content calendar schedule. They emerge slowly, through sustained attention to questions that matter to you. When you give yourself permission to explore ideas over weeks or months instead of rushing to publish everything immediately, you develop a depth that's impossible to fake.

I've watched creators with 1,000 engaged subscribers build more sustainable businesses than creators with 10,000 passive followers. The difference isn't audience size, it's the quality of thinking they're developing and the trust they're building through that thinking.

The Creator Retreat is an example.
We have a sustainable, growing, and scalable business model
with only 676 subscribers!

The compound effect of this approach is initially invisible, which is why most creators abandon it in favor of faster growth strategies. But creators who stick with depth building for eighteen months often experience a sudden acceleration that looks like overnight success but is actually the result of sustained investment in their own thinking.

The Real Metrics That Matter

Stop measuring success by platform metrics. Start measuring success by creative metrics:

• How often are you surprised by your own thinking?

• How frequently do reader responses help you see your ideas from new angles?

• Are you developing ideas that feel genuinely original to you?

• Do you feel more connected to your own creative voice than you did six months ago?

• Are you attracting people who challenge your thinking in productive ways?

• Does your work feel like it's building toward something larger?

These metrics are harder to track in a dashboard, but they're the ones that predict long-term creative satisfaction and sustainable success.

When you optimize for these metrics instead of subscriber count or engagement rates, your work becomes more interesting—both to you and to your readers. You start developing ideas that feel genuinely original rather than just variations on what everyone else is saying.

The Compound Effect of Depth

Substack rewards depth in ways that other platforms can't. Every newsletter you send builds on previous newsletters. Every thoughtful response deepens the relationship with that reader. Every genuine insight you develop increases your capacity for the next insight.

The platform's structure supports this if you let it. Subscribers aren't just following your content—they're following your intellectual development. The more interesting you become to yourself, the more interesting you become to them.

This creates a compound effect that's impossible to achieve through hustle tactics:

Your ideas become more sophisticated because you're building on previous exploration rather than starting from scratch each time. Your audience becomes more engaged because they're invested in your ongoing thinking, not just consuming individual pieces. Your creative confidence grows because you're developing a body of work that represents genuine exploration.

The creators who will still be here in five years aren't the ones chasing growth hacks. They're the ones who figured out how to use these tools to become more interesting to themselves.

The Permission You're Not Giving Yourself

I think that most creators on Substack are still asking permission to take their own ideas seriously. Sometimes I even find myself in that space.

They're writing apologetically, hedging their insights, waiting for someone to validate their perspective before they fully commit to developing it.

The creators who break through give themselves permission to be genuinely curious in public. They write about what fascinates them, not what they think will fascinate others. They develop their thinking through their writing, not despite it.

This isn't about confidence—it's about curiosity. When you're genuinely interested in understanding something, that interest becomes contagious. Readers can sense when you're exploring something because you have to versus because you want to.

The question isn't "Am I qualified to write about this?"

The question is "Am I curious enough about this to think about it deeply and share that thinking honestly?"

When you give yourself permission to follow your curiosity publicly, something shifts in how your newsletter functions. Instead of feeling like you need to have all the answers, you can invite your readers into your thinking process. Your newsletter becomes a space where you're genuinely working through ideas, and your readers become collaborators in that exploration.

This is radically different from traditional content creation, where you're expected to deliver polished insights to passive consumers. When you're genuinely exploring questions, your readers can contribute perspectives you hadn't considered, challenge assumptions you didn't realize you were making, and help you see blind spots in your thinking.

The Real Opportunity

The real opportunity with Substack isn't to build an audience. It's to build a creative practice that sustains itself.

When you use the platform to develop your thinking, to explore your curiosities, to build relationships with people who care about similar questions, you create something that can last for decades. You're not dependent on algorithmic luck or viral moments. You're building on the foundation of your own intellectual development.

Traditional social media platforms want you to post constantly, optimize everything, and compete for attention. Substack's structure actually supports the opposite approach: developing ideas over time, building depth rather than breadth, creating relationships rather than just generating impressions.

But only if you resist the temptation to import the hustle mentality from other platforms.

What This Looks Like in Practice

Creators who have figured this out approach their work differently:

They use Notes to explore questions that genuinely interest them, not to maximize engagement. They pay attention to which of their curiosities generate energy—both from readers and within themselves.

They use their newsletter to develop those curiosities into fully formed thinking. They're not afraid to spend weeks or months exploring one idea if it feels important to them.

They build on previous work instead of starting fresh every time. They reference earlier newsletters, develop ongoing themes, and let their thinking evolve publicly.

They measure success by the quality of their thinking and the depth of their reader relationships, not by vanity metrics.

Most importantly, they've stopped asking "what should I write about?" and started asking "what am I curious about right now?"

The Long-Term Vision

That's the real magic of understanding Substack as two interconnected systems: you can use one to discover what you're curious about, and the other to develop that curiosity into something meaningful. The platform becomes a tool for creative development, not just content distribution.

The feedback loop between exploration and development creates a sustainable creative practice that doesn't depend on external validation or algorithmic distribution. You're building something that belongs to you, supported by people who are genuinely interested in your thinking.

The question isn't whether you should use Substack. The question is: are you ready to take your own curiosity seriously enough to build something around it?

When you step through the gates of The Creator Retreat, you leave the noise of Substack growth hacks behind. Upgrade to paid to gain access to our full library of monthly workshops, guest presentations, and special events.